1
Phys. Rev. C76 14007(2007) A. Arriaga University of Lisbon, Portugal TRENTO, 2009 R. Schiavilla JLAB, USA
Reaction
Deuteron electrodisintegration
one-photon-exchange approximation
(−) Ψ ;Sλ,T
2
r e →e f , k f
r (n, p ) → Pf ≡ E f , Pf
µ
(
)
r γ → q ≡ (ω , q )
µ
r e →e i , ki
r d → Pi µ ≡ E i , Pi ΨM
(
)
Framework
3
Relativistic Hamiltonian Dynamics :Instant Form implementation
Relativistic invariance achieved through Poincaré group algebra
Generators independent of time and energy
Hamiltonian and boost generators contain interaction terms
Cross Section
Deuteron electrodisintegration cross section
invariant response functions
4
d σ dε ' dΩ'
2
= σ M W2 (Q , q µ Pi ) + W1 (Q , q µ Pi ) tan θ 2
relevant response function for θ ≥ 155º
[
2
µ
2
µ
2
]
Mott cross section
r ˆ keeping only W1 : involves A(qz , k ; Sλ , T , M )
r r r r (−) ˆ ˆ A qz, k ; Sλ , T , M = Ψkr ;Sλ ,T V f j|_ (qz ) ΨM Vi
2
(
)
( )
( )
Breit frame
transverse component of the current
Electromagnetic Currents
1- and 2-body currents r r r r r r r r r j = ∑ ji ( p 'i , pi ) + j12 ( p '1 , p' 2 , p1 , p 2 )
i =1, 2
5
nucleon Pauli form factor
1-body current
p'i
q
nucleon Dirac form factor Dirac spinor
α
pi
i α αβ ji = u F1,i γ + F2,iσ q β u 2m
Höhler parametrization of f.f. keeping full Lorentz structure
Electromagnetic Currents
2-body currents - π exchange current: PV coupling
seagul diagrams
p'i
6
π
q
π
q
ki = p'i − pi
pi
r r r fπ2 fπ2 V j12 = −iGE (τ 1 ×τ 2 )z NN 2 2 mπ k 2µ k 2 − mπ µ r [u1γγ 5u1 ] kν u2γ ν γ 5u2 + 1→ 2 2 ←
[
]
nucleon isovector Sachs form factor
keeping full Lorentz structure
Electromagnetic Currents
π in flight diagram
p'i
7
2-body currents - π exchange current: PV coupling
π
q
2 r r f πNN r r V r j12 = iGE (τ 1 ×τ 2 )z k 2 − k1 2 mπ
ki = p'i − pi
pi
(
)
ν
2 1 ν 5 1 2 ν 5 2
f π2
µ
2
f π2
µ
2
k1 k1 − mπ k 2 k 2 − mπ
µ µ
[k u γ γ u ] [k u γ γ u ]
ν
1
nucleon isovector Sachs form factors
keeping full Lorentz structure
Relativistic Hamiltonian
8
Relativistic Hamiltonian to generate wave funct.
H = 2 p +m +v
► vµ NN interaction and consists of
µ
2
2
µ
vR – short range part paramatrized as Argonne v18 vπµ − relativistic OPEP
µ = 1 – pseudovector coupling µ = -1 – pseudoscalar coupling
related by unitary µ = 0 – minimal non-locality choice transform.
Relativistic OPEP
off-shell term
9
Relativistic OPEP with off-shell term - nonlocal
r r m NR m m m − µ ( E '− E ) O v ( p ' , p ) = vπ E' E E' E
µ π
vπ = −
NR
f
2 πNN
fπ
2
2 2 mπ k 2 + mπ
O=
r r r σ 1 ⋅ p'σ 2 ⋅ p' E '+ m
r
−
rr r σ 1 ⋅ pσ 2 ⋅ p E+m
r
choosing µ = 1 for consistency with π exchange current initial and final states generated with this interaction
Wave Functions
Deuteron wave function – bound state
10
r r r ψ M ( p;0) = ψ M ;S ( p;0) + ψ M ; D ( p;0) r in the pair cm frame : Vi = 0
Deuteron properties ≠ due to: local character of NR interaction nonlocal character of R interaction
Wave Functions
Deuteron wave function – bound state
NR - D state % - 5.76% R - D state % - 6.24%
11
u (r ) r
w( r ) r
differences due to the non-local character of vπµ, which has short range
Wave Functions
np wave function – scattering state standard Lippmann-Shwinger equation
plane wave piece interaction piece
12
Ψ
( −) r k , Sλ T
r r r ( −) ( p;0) = φ kr , SλT ( p;0) + ψ kr , SλT ( p;0)
r in the pair cm frame : V f = 0
incoming boundary conditions
all channels up to J=3
1
∑ ∫ (2π ) 2
M'
S
r dk '
r r ST * Tλλ ' (k , k ' )
3
E k − E k ' − iε
r φ kr ', Sλ 'T ( p;0)
NN T-matrix
Wave Functions
np wave function – scattering state
1
13
S0
NR R
u (r; E ) r
tiny relativistic effects due to vanishing tensor force
Boosts
r paralel to V
14
Boosting wave functions from cm to Breit frame
r r r r r r r Ψ ( p;V ) ≡ B( p;V )Ψ ( p|| γ , p| _ ;0) perpend to V
Lorentz contraction in move direction
r r r r 1 i r r B ( p; V ) = V ⋅ (σ 1 − σ 2 ) × p 1 − γ 4m
kinematical boost corrections retained spin-dependent (Thomas preces.) included to order V 2 interaction-dependent terms neglected
IA results
Tcm=1.5MeV, θ=155º
relativistic effects significant only for Q2 ≥ 40 fm-2 boost effects dominate and increase the cross section
15
IA+π results π
Tcm=1.5MeV, θ=155º 1- and 2-body currents Tcm=1.5MeV, θ=155º
16
π exchange current important contribution rel. effects significant even for low Q2 boost effects dominate for Q2 > 60fm-2 and increase the cross section rel. effects in wave functions and currents reduce the cross section for Q2 ~18 - 40 fm-2
Summary
IA
relativistic effects significant only for Q2 ≥ 40 fm-2 boost effects dominate and increase the cross section dominant boost correction comes from Lorentz contraction
17
Summary
IA+π
π-exchange current means important contribution specially in the relativistic calculation relativistic effects are significant even for low Q2
18
relativistic effects in wave functions and currents reduce cross section in the region Q2 ~18 – 40 fm-2 boosts effects dominate only for Q2 > 60 fm-2 and increase the cross section dominant boost contribution comes from Lorentz contraction retardation in currents gives negligible effect
Summary
NR and R calculations do not reproduce data at Q2 > 40 fm-2 Need of new model for the currents?
Inclusion of additional short range two-body currents
19
Need of more work to understand the discrepancy between theory and data